string(4) "test" EXAMINING THE REPRESENTATION OF FAMILY DYNAMICS IN POPULAR CHILDREN’S NOVELS | International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

EXAMINING THE REPRESENTATION OF FAMILY DYNAMICS IN POPULAR CHILDREN’S NOVELS

Abstract

Family dynamics play a crucial role in shaping children’s perceptions of relationships, identity, and social norms. Popular children’s novels often reflect and reinforce various aspects of family life, influencing young readers' understanding of family roles and values. This study explores the representation of family dynamics in well-known children’s literature, analyzing how different types of families—nuclear, single-parent, extended, and unconventional—are portrayed. Through content analysis of selected novels, this research examines themes of parental authority, sibling relationships, and emotional support within families. The findings suggest that while traditional family structures are common, contemporary literature increasingly features diverse family models, reflecting changing societal norms.

PDF

References

  1. Nikolajeva, M. (2005). Children’s Literature Comes of Age: Toward a New Aesthetic. Routledge.
  2. Nodelman, P., & Reimer, M. (2003). The Pleasures of Children’s Literature. Allyn & Bacon.
  3. Hunt, P. (1994). An Introduction to Children’s Literature. Oxford University Press.
  4. Rowling, J.K. (1997). Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. Bloomsbury.
  5. Alcott, L.M. (1868). Little Women. Roberts Brothers.
  6. Lewis, C.S. (1950). The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. Geoffrey Bles.
  7. Dahl, R. (1988). Matilda. Jonathan Cape.
  8. Burnett, F.H. (1911). The Secret Garden. Frederick A. Stokes.
  9. Islomovna, V. S., & Zoirovna, N. I. (2020). Realistic genre and its development in world literature. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 388-396.
  10. Narziyeva Inobat Zoirovna. (2024). Scientists who contributed to the development of children’s literature. Sustainability of Education, Socio-Economic Science Theory, 2(19), 35-37.